HomeNewsAngry reaction as AFL breaks Grand Final promise: ‘Completely unnecessary’

Angry reaction as AFL breaks Grand Final promise: ‘Completely unnecessary’

On the AFL Grand Final day at the MCG, controversy arose when politics entered the pre-game entertainment. Singer-songwriter Jess Hitchcock and didgeridoo player William Barton performed a rendition of Waltzing Matilda, which was applauded by the live audience. However, viewers at home took offense to Hitchcock’s outfit, as she had the word “Yes” printed in bright pink lettering on her midsection. This led to accusations that the AFL was pushing a political agenda by advocating for a “Yes” vote in the upcoming referendum on October 14.

Many fans expressed their frustration on social media, with one Twitter user describing the performance as a “terrible rendition” and labeling it an unnecessary promotion of the “Yes” vote. This comment reflected a sentiment felt by others who believed that the AFL should remain neutral and not use its platform to promote any political stance.

The controversy came amid a highly divisive national referendum that has been dividing the country. The referendum, also known as “The Voice Referendum,” centers around a proposal to establish a constitutionally-recognized Indigenous voice to the Australian Parliament. Supporters argue that this voice would give Indigenous Australians a say in laws and policies that directly affect them. However, opponents are concerned that it could lead to a separate parliament and potentially undermine national unity.

The AFL has long been a platform for social and political issues, with players and teams often expressing their support for causes such as marriage equality and Indigenous rights. However, some fans argue that the Grand Final day should be a time for sports and entertainment, free from political messaging.

While Hitchcock and Barton’s performance was praised by the live audience, the controversy surrounding Hitchcock’s outfit overshadowed its reception. Some argued that the AFL had failed to consider the potential backlash and had allowed a political agenda to take precedence over the sporting event.

This incident highlights the fine line that organizations like the AFL must tread when it comes to social and political issues. While supporting causes and creating awareness can be seen as positive, it is essential to consider the potential divisiveness and impact on the overall enjoyment of the event.

Overall, while the AFL Grand Final day is traditionally a voice-free day, the inclusion of the referendum issue in the pre-game entertainment sparked controversy and frustration among fans. The performance by Hitchcock and Barton was well-received by the live audience, but the word “Yes” on Hitchcock’s outfit caused consternation among viewers at home. As the nation remains divided on the referendum issue, the incident further highlights the difficulties in navigating politics and entertainment on a platform as significant as the AFL Grand Final day.

Keep Reading Latest Sports News on Sportyjones.com

Neuro Admin
Neuro Adminhttps://sportyjones.com/
I'm Adam Smith, your go-to sports aficionado from the land down under. My heart beats for cricket, rugby, and Aussie Rules footy. With over a decade in sports writing, I bring you the inside scoop on all things sports at SportyJones.com. Let's dive into the action!
RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular