Police in Australia are pushing for an apprehended violence order (AVO) to be taken out against Sri Lankan cricket star Danushka Gunathilaka, despite him being cleared of sexually assaulting a woman at her Sydney home. Gunathilaka, 32, was allowed to leave Australia in October after spending about 10 months on bail. He was acquitted following a judge-alone trial in September. The police had alleged that Gunathilaka had removed a condom without consent, which is also known as “stealthing”, during a sexual encounter with a woman he had met on Tinder.
The case returned to the Local Court, where it was revealed that police were still pressing for an AVO to be taken out on the woman’s behalf. Gunathilaka, who is a Sri Lankan cricketer, was ultimately acquitted of the charges. Despite this, the police are pushing for the AVO to protect the woman from Gunathilaka. The police prosecutor informed the court that they are seeking the AVO on the grounds that the woman is in fear of Gunathilaka and wants legal protection. The matter will return to court at a later date for a decision.
The case has garnered widespread attention due to Gunathilaka’s status as a prominent cricket player and the nature of the allegations against him. The concept of “stealthing” has been the subject of much debate and controversy in recent years, as it involves the non-consensual removal of a condom during sexual intercourse. Gunathilaka’s acquittal indicates that the court did not find sufficient evidence to convict him of the alleged crime. However, the police are still pursuing the AVO on behalf of the woman involved.
The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the complexities and nuances of cases involving allegations of sexual assault and consent. Despite being cleared of the charges, Gunathilaka may still face legal restrictions if an AVO is taken out against him. The case also raises questions about the role of the justice system in addressing and adjudicating on such sensitive and contentious issues.
The case has also raised broader discussions about the treatment of sports stars and public figures in the legal system. Gunathilaka’s status as a well-known cricketer has likely contributed to the public interest in the case and the scrutiny of the legal proceedings. The outcome of the case and the decision on the AVO will have implications for Gunathilaka’s personal and professional life.
In conclusion, the ongoing legal battle involving Danushka Gunathilaka highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding allegations of sexual assault and consent. Despite being acquitted of the charges, Gunathilaka may still face legal ramifications if an apprehended violence order is taken out against him. The case has sparked widespread attention and discussions about the treatment of sports stars in the legal system and raises broader questions about the role of the justice system in addressing such sensitive issues. The ultimate decision on the AVO will have significant implications for Gunathilaka’s personal and professional life.
Get More Cricket News on Sportyjones.com